Findings from several recent studies are sobering. Depression is now the leading cause of ill-health and disability worldwide–more than cancer, heart disease, respiratory problems, and accidents. Yesterday, researchers reported that serious psychological distress is at an all-time high, significantly affecting not only quality but actual life expectancy. And who has not heard about the opioid crisis?
The research is clear: psychotherapy helps. Indeed, its effectiveness is on par with coronary artery bypass surgery. Despite such results, availability of mental health services in the U.S. and other Westernized nations has seriously eroded over the last decade. Additionally, modern clinical practice is beset by regulation and paperwork, much of which gets in the way of treatment’s most important healing ingredient: the relationship.
What can practitioners do?
Completing paperwork together with clients during the visit–a process termed, “collaborative (or concurrent) documentation”–has been shown to save full-time practitioners between 6 and 8 hours per week, thereby improving capacity up to 20%.
It’s a great idea: completing assessments, treatment plans, and progress notes together with clients during rather than after the session. Unfortunately, it’s chief selling point to date seems to be that it saves time on documentation–as though filling out paperwork is an end in and of itself! Clearly, the real challenges facing mental health services are getting people into and keeping them in care. Here, the research literature is clear, people are more likely to stay engaged in care that is: (1) organized around their goals; and (2) works. Collaborating on and coming to a consensus regarding the goals for treatment, for example, has the largest impact on outcome among all of the relationship factors in psychotherapy, including empathy! Additionally, when documentation FITs the clients’ view of the process and is deemed transparent and respectful, trust–another essential ingredient of the therapeutic relationship–improves.
For the last several years, practitioners and agencies around the world have been using the ICCE “Service Delivery Agreement” and “Progress Note” as part of their documentation of clinical services. Both were specifically designed to be completed collaboratively with clients at the time the service is provided and both are focused on documenting what matters to people in treatment. Most important of all, however, both are part of an evidence-based process documented to improve engagement and effectiveness listed on SAMHSA’s National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices.
If you’d like a copies for yourself, just email me at scottdmiller@talkingcure.com.
I’m already getting your email updates, but I want to make sure to get this info
thank you
James
Thank you Scott for another very inspiring and informed message.
The information that you have already provided has helped me tremendously. I look forward to receiving updates to further enhance my effectiveness. Thank you, Scott!
Thank you for more great research based information and generosity in sharing it
Thanks again. Unable to attend but am trying to get the small agency I’m working for to send their lead therapist. Valuable information that should be curriculum requirement.
Can you please send me the scales (ORS and SRS)? Thank you very much!
I love your theory and measurement tools. I have used them extensively. I was disappointed in the progress note because it would not meet the requirements of my third-party payers. But I have made my own progress note incorporating your measurement tools.
I also have a suggestion. I know you have the online versions of the ICCE that require a monthly fee. But I would like to see you join with online EMRs like SimplePractice (that’s the one I use). I would be willing to pay extra to use it if it were inside SimplePractice.
Hi Laura…thanks for your note…as I said in my email, the forms may be modified to fit local statutes…each state and insurer has slightly different requirements…the key is the focus on outcomes at intake, service planning, and over time.
As for the electronic platforms, I do not own or operate any of the existing systems. The are all owned independently. Nearly all offer an API which can be used to incorporate the measures and metrics into various E.H.R.’s. Users of the various systems must ASK their provider to include the measures. This has been done in several systems thus far, including Athena’s Penelope.
Thanks for your generosity and expertise Scott. As a new graduate in the field I would greatly appreciate the forms and accompanying booklet.
I’d like to receive the forms for clinical use & improvement.