SCOTT D Miller - For the latest and greatest information on Feedback Informed Treatment

  • About
    • About Scott
    • Publications
  • Training and Consultation
  • Workshop Calendar
  • FIT Measures Licensing
  • FIT Software Tools
  • Online Store
  • Top Performance Blog
  • Contact Scott
scottdmiller@ talkingcure.com +1.773.454.8511

Session Frequency and Outcome: What is the “Right Dose” for Effective Psychotherapy?

December 16, 2021 By scottdm Leave a Comment

covid wrecking ballThe last two years have been difficult.  Whether through illness, death of loved ones, job loss, economic insecurity, or social isolation, few have escaped the consequences of the worldwide pandemic.

While government and media attention has been focused on physical health, rates of anxiety and depression have soared (1).  Younger people have been particularly impacted.  One recent study found half of those surveyed were at risk for major depression (2).  Such findings have been confirmed in a soon-to-be published study of data generated by practitioners using the ORS and SRS to monitor the care being provided to thousands of adults, adolescents, and children around the world.  Briefly, an international group of researchers and scholars found a trend toward increasing episodes of longer lengths of overall less effective care among adolescents and younger adults.

In the US, regardless of client age, therapists are struggling to keep up with demand for mental health services.  It’s not a new problem.  It’s one that has worsened significantly since the outbreak of COVID-19 (3, 4).

Before and after covid

In this environment of demand exceeding availability, it has become increasingly common for clinicians to both: (1) carry higher caseloads; and (2) deliver services on an attenuated schedule for returning clients.  Said another way, clinicians are seeing more people, but not the same ones from week to week.  Instead, the sessions of those already in care are being spaced further apart so that new intakes can be accommodated (5).

While such developments are entirely understandable in the present environment, the question is whether they constitute sound clinical practice?  And where therapeutic effectiveness is concerned, the answer is an unequivocal, “no.”   Despite quantity (e.g., number of sessions) not being correlated with outcome, studies do show a clear relationship between frequency and effectiveness — specifically, faster rates of change, improved chances of recovering sooner, and lower rates of attrition (6, 7, 8, 9).

Mindful of such findings, is there anything practitioners and agencies can do to more effectively balance demand with availability?  Here, research indicates the answer is, “yes.”

Over the last decade, data have been gathered about the progress of millions of clients via the routine administration of standardized outcome measures.  As readers of this already blog know, studies show using the resulting information to adjust services to better fit the individual (aka, Feedback-Informed Treatment) improves retention and outcome while also reducing costs (click here to access a spreadsheet containing a current list of studies).

Importantly, the very same data is providing therapists and clients with detailed, evidence-based guidance for optimizing the frequency, dose and intensity of services.  As all clinicians know, some clients need and benefit from more, other less.  With demand at historically high rates, being able to determine which is which enables practitioners to utilize their limited availability wisely, ensuring maximal improvement for each individual client (10).

If you are interested in learning more, join me and the faculty at the International Center for Clinical Excellence for the next Feedback-Informed Treatment Intensive Trainings.   As has been the case since the pandemic first began, this year’s events are entirely online.  For more information or to register, click the icons below.

In the meantime, all the best for the Holiday season,

Scott

Scott D. Miller, Ph.D.
Director, International Center for Clinical Excellence

Feedback Informed Treatment (FIT) Intensive ONLINE

FIT Supervision Intensive 2022 ONLINE

Filed Under: Feedback Informed Treatment - FIT, FIT

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

SEARCH

Subscribe for updates from my blog.

loader

Email Address*

Name

Upcoming Training

Oct
01

Training of Trainers 2025


Nov
20

FIT Implementation Intensive 2025

FIT Software tools

FIT Software tools

LinkedIn

Topics of Interest:

  • behavioral health (5)
  • Behavioral Health (112)
  • Brain-based Research (2)
  • CDOI (14)
  • Conferences and Training (67)
  • deliberate practice (31)
  • Dodo Verdict (9)
  • Drug and Alcohol (3)
  • evidence-based practice (67)
  • excellence (63)
  • Feedback (40)
  • Feedback Informed Treatment – FIT (246)
  • FIT (29)
  • FIT Software Tools (12)
  • ICCE (26)
  • Implementation (7)
  • medication adherence (3)
  • obesity (1)
  • PCOMS (11)
  • Practice Based Evidence (39)
  • PTSD (4)
  • Suicide (1)
  • supervision (1)
  • Termination (1)
  • Therapeutic Relationship (9)
  • Top Performance (40)

Recent Posts

  • Agape
  • Snippets
  • Results from the first bona fide study of deliberate practice
  • Fasten your seatbelt
  • A not so helpful, helping hand

Recent Comments

  • Dr Martin Russell on Agape
  • hima on Simple, not Easy: Using the ORS and SRS Effectively
  • hima on The Cryptonite of Behavioral Health: Making Mistakes
  • himalaya on Alas, it seems everyone comes from Lake Wobegon
  • himalayan on Do certain people respond better to specific forms of psychotherapy?

Tags

addiction Alliance behavioral health brief therapy Carl Rogers CBT cdoi common factors conferences continuing education denmark evidence based medicine evidence based practice Evolution of Psychotherapy excellence feedback feedback informed treatment healthcare holland icce international center for cliniclal excellence medicine mental health meta-analysis Norway NREPP ors outcome measurement outcome rating scale post traumatic stress practice-based evidence psychology psychometrics psychotherapy psychotherapy networker public behavioral health randomized clinical trial SAMHSA session rating scale srs supershrinks sweden Therapist Effects therapy Training