SCOTT D Miller - For the latest and greatest information on Feedback Informed Treatment

  • About
    • About Scott
    • Publications
  • Training and Consultation
  • Workshop Calendar
  • FIT Measures Licensing
  • FIT Software Tools
  • Online Store
  • Top Performance Blog
  • Contact Scott
scottdmiller@ talkingcure.com +1.773.454.8511

How Knowing the Origins of Psychotherapy Can Improve Your Effectiveness

January 19, 2022 By scottdm Leave a Comment

Freud & Quimby

Ever see the film, Sliding Doors?

It’s an older movie with a familiar plot.  Life can change in an instant — in this case, depending on whether or not lead character, Helen (played by Gwyneth Paltrow), catches a train.   Both possibilities are explored, the results being dramatically different.

Now, consider the pictures to the left.  Chances are you recognize one and not the other.  Of course, one is strongly connected to the origins of psychotherapy, perhaps best considered the founder.  He inspired a generation of followers, with several of his acolytes going on to achieve the same or even greater recognition and fame.  The fundamental and revolutionary principle of his work?  Many of the problems people struggle with are psychogenic in origin.  Talking about them helped.

No, its not Freud.  It’s the person on the left, Phineas Parkhurst Quimby.

Never heard of him?   Sliding Doors.subway

By the time Freud was born, Quimby had been working for nearly two decades.  His ideas and approach gave rise to the “New Thought” or “Mind Cure” movement in the United States, the philosophical and technical aspects of which arguably bear a much greater resemblance to the modern practice of psychotherapy than Freud’s.  In sum, it emphasized the healing power of emotions, thoughts, and positive beliefs (1).

Unfortunately, the movement Quimby inspired occurred at roughly the same time American medical practitioners were professionalizing.  Buoyed by a growing list of scientific discoveries, the group embraced the “somatic paradigm,” treating subjects of mind and emotion as relics of a bygone, unscientific era.  In periodicals, professional journals, and the courts, they convincingly argued psychological suffering was the result of physical “lesions,” be they located in the brain, spine or elsewhere.  Anyone believing otherwise was superstitious at best, potentially dangerous at worse.

The rest is, as is often said, history.  It is interesting to imagine how mental health care might be different today had the medicophysical paradigm emerging in the final decades of the 19th century not so thoroughly vanquished a psychological point of view.  Freud — who biographer, Frank Sulloway once famously labeled, “The biologist of the mind” — might well be a footnote in the story of the field.  How might our understanding of and ability to help be different had we embraced the role of thinking, emotion, and trauma so central to contemporary treatment approaches, a century ago?

empty subwayThen again, what if, in reality, we’re all still standing on the platform waiting for our train to arrive?  After all, much of what occupied professional attention then, continues to dominate now.  For example, the field acts as though our methods are specifically remedial to the problems our clients bring to care.  Thus, CBT is said to cure by targeting the dysfunctional thoughts that cause depression while brain-based approaches rewire the “neural foundations of various disorders and lead[ing] to specific psychotherapeutic conclusions” (2).  Common wisdom holds the most enlightened perspective is some kind of hybrid — the biopsychosocial model.  All clear representations of the medical model.  All which enjoy no empirical support.  All which may be implicated in the lack of improvement in the outcome of psychotherapy over the last four decades (it’s likely longer, but valid and reliable studies of effectiveness only started appearing in the late 1950’s [3, 4, 5]).

What, you might ask, is the alternative?  That’s exactly what Dan Lewis, M.D. and I discuss on the latest installment of the Book Case.   All Aboard!

PLEASE, let me know your thoughts …

Scott

Scott D. Miller, Ph.D.
Director, International Center for Clinical Excellence

 

Filed Under: Feedback Informed Treatment - FIT

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

SEARCH

Subscribe for updates from my blog.

loader

Email Address*

Name

Upcoming Training

Oct
01

Training of Trainers 2025


Nov
20

FIT Implementation Intensive 2025

FIT Software tools

FIT Software tools

LinkedIn

Topics of Interest:

  • Behavioral Health (112)
  • behavioral health (5)
  • Brain-based Research (2)
  • CDOI (14)
  • Conferences and Training (67)
  • deliberate practice (31)
  • Dodo Verdict (9)
  • Drug and Alcohol (3)
  • evidence-based practice (67)
  • excellence (63)
  • Feedback (40)
  • Feedback Informed Treatment – FIT (246)
  • FIT (29)
  • FIT Software Tools (12)
  • ICCE (26)
  • Implementation (7)
  • medication adherence (3)
  • obesity (1)
  • PCOMS (11)
  • Practice Based Evidence (39)
  • PTSD (4)
  • Suicide (1)
  • supervision (1)
  • Termination (1)
  • Therapeutic Relationship (9)
  • Top Performance (40)

Recent Posts

  • Agape
  • Snippets
  • Results from the first bona fide study of deliberate practice
  • Fasten your seatbelt
  • A not so helpful, helping hand

Recent Comments

  • Dr Martin Russell on Agape
  • hima on Simple, not Easy: Using the ORS and SRS Effectively
  • hima on The Cryptonite of Behavioral Health: Making Mistakes
  • himalaya on Alas, it seems everyone comes from Lake Wobegon
  • himalayan on Do certain people respond better to specific forms of psychotherapy?

Tags

addiction Alliance behavioral health brief therapy Carl Rogers CBT cdoi common factors conferences continuing education denmark evidence based medicine evidence based practice Evolution of Psychotherapy excellence feedback feedback informed treatment healthcare holland icce international center for cliniclal excellence medicine mental health meta-analysis Norway NREPP ors outcome measurement outcome rating scale post traumatic stress practice-based evidence psychology psychometrics psychotherapy psychotherapy networker public behavioral health randomized clinical trial SAMHSA session rating scale srs supershrinks sweden Therapist Effects therapy Training