SCOTT D Miller - For the latest and greatest information on Feedback Informed Treatment

  • About
    • About Scott
    • Publications
  • Training and Consultation
  • Workshop Calendar
  • FIT Measures Licensing
  • FIT Software Tools
  • Online Store
  • Top Performance Blog
  • Contact Scott
info@scottdmiller.com 773.404.5130

BAD THERAPY

July 28, 2020 By scottdm 5 Comments

bad dogBad therapy.

Are you guilty of it?  A quick internet search turned up only 15 books on the subject.  It’s strange, especially when you consider that between 5 and 10% of clients are actually worse off following treatment and an additional 35-40% experience no benefit whatsoever!  (Yep, that’s nearly 50%)

And what about those numerous “micro-failures.”  You know the ones I’m talking about?  Those miniature ruptures, empathic missteps, and outright gaffs committed during the therapy hour.  For example, seated opposite your client, empathic look glued to your face and suddenly you cannot remember your client’s name?  Or worse, you call them by someone else’s.  The point is, there’s a lot of bad therapy.

Why don’t we therapists talk about these experiences more often?  Could it possibly be that we don’t know?  Four years on, I can still remember the surprise I felt when Norwegian researcher, Jorgen Flor, found most therapists had a hard time recalling any clients they hadn’t helped.

One group does know — and recently, they’ve been talking their experiences!  The Very Bad Therapy podcast is one of my favorites.  After listening to sixty-some-odd episodes of clients exposing our shortcomings, I reached out to the podcast’s two fearless interviewers, clinicians Ben Fineman and Carrie Wiita, to learn what had motivated them to start the series in the first place and what, if anything, they’d learned along the way.  Here’s what I promise: they have no shame (and its a good thing for us they don’t)!

OK, that’s it for now.  Until next time, all the best,

Scott

Scott D. Miller, Ph.D.
Director, International Center for Clinical Excellence
FIT IMP 2020

 

 

 

 

P.S.: For the first time ever, we’re offering the FIT Implementation Intensive Online.  It’s one of the four courses required for certification as an ICCE FIT Trainer.  As with our “in-person” events, we have an international faculty and strictly limit the number of participants to 40 to ensure the highest quality experience.  Click here for more information or to register.

Filed Under: Feedback Informed Treatment - FIT

Comments

  1. Marc Wong says

    July 29, 2020 at 6:46 am

    I heard you on Daniel Rosen’s podcast.
    I write about listening and I’d like to share some thoughts on the fundamental dynamics of listening with you. First, a quick story:

    Meghan watches as her mother finishes a telephone call.
    “Mommy, why are you crying?” she asks gently.
    “I’m okay,” mommy sighs, “I’m okay.”
    Meghan leaves the room and comes back moments later.
    “When I’m sad, I hold on to Mr. Brown,” she says, handing over a teddy bear to her mother.

    To me, a great listener finds a way to graciously share their best with a speaker, while respecting the speaker’s story the entire time. There is no “teddy bear” technique. They offer their best so the speaker can think, feel, and speak outside their comfort zone, so they can tell a “better” story, and create a “better” future.

    Many things can of course go wrong in this process. The listener may not know how to share their best. The listener may not have the appropriate experiences to share. It can take a long time to discover what a speaker needs. The speaker may simply not like teddy bears. The listener can slip and make mistakes.

    In addition, a listener has to constantly improve. How? By feeling and experiencing, and then abstracting those feelings and experiences, and deriving personal and universal meanings. Great listeners think about things as they appear, and search for underlying interconnections and significance. They realize that sadness doesn’t have to be permanent or crippling, that happiness and success aren’t guaranteed. They’ve developed ways to deal with life, and can even graciously share those with others (eg. offering someone a teddy bear).

    I believe a clear example of the fundamental dynamics can serve as a overall guiding principle, and also help explain why things succeed or fail in practice.

    I hope you find this interesting.

    Reply
  2. Bert Munger says

    July 30, 2020 at 1:02 pm

    That’s the trouble with using measures. If you test, you’re going to find problems. I have to admit there have been times when my measuring lapsed. I didn’t like seeing evidence of my inadequacy. I can empathize with the impulse to do less testing. Nevertheless, measuring doesn’t create problems, it creates awareness of problems.

    Reply
  3. Jeff Taylor says

    July 30, 2020 at 4:35 pm

    Thanks for sharing this important message.

    Reply
  4. David G. Markham says

    July 30, 2020 at 6:15 pm

    I wish there was a podcast entitled, “Very good therapy.”

    Will you be following up, Scott, with a post on the supershrinks? What do they do that makes their performance better than the average?

    Reply
  5. Heidi Ashley says

    August 5, 2020 at 6:22 am

    Listen to the Very Bad Therapy podcast and they do give you the answers to this!

    Feedback-informed treatment
    Use of outcome measures
    Deliberate Practice

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

SEARCH

Subscribe for updates from my blog.

  

Upcoming Training

Mar
17

Feedback Informed Treatment (FIT) Intensive ONLINE


Mar
22

FIT Supervision Intensive 2021 ONLINE


Mar
30

FIT SPRING CAFÉ 2


Aug
02

FIT Implementation Intensive 2021


Aug
04

Training of Trainers 2021

FIT Software tools

FIT Software tools

NREPP Certified

HTML tutorial

LinkedIn

Topics of Interest:

  • Behavioral Health (111)
  • behavioral health (4)
  • Brain-based Research (2)
  • CDOI (14)
  • Conferences and Training (67)
  • deliberate practice (28)
  • Dodo Verdict (9)
  • Drug and Alcohol (3)
  • evidence-based practice (66)
  • excellence (61)
  • Feedback (38)
  • Feedback Informed Treatment – FIT (206)
  • FIT (26)
  • FIT Software Tools (12)
  • ICCE (26)
  • Implementation (7)
  • medication adherence (3)
  • obesity (1)
  • PCOMS (11)
  • Practice Based Evidence (38)
  • PTSD (4)
  • Suicide (1)
  • supervision (1)
  • Termination (1)
  • Therapeutic Relationship (8)
  • Top Performance (39)

Recent Posts

  • Feedback Informed Treatment in Statutory Services (Child Protection, Court Mandated)
  • Do We Learn from Our Clients? Yes, No, Maybe So …
  • Developing a Sustainable Deliberate Practice Plan
  • Making Sense of Client Feedback
  • Umpires and Psychotherapists

Recent Comments

  • Asta on The Expert on Expertise: An Interview with K. Anders Ericsson
  • Michael McCarthy on Culture and Psychotherapy: What Does the Research Say?
  • Jim Reynolds on Culture and Psychotherapy: What Does the Research Say?
  • gloria sayler on Culture and Psychotherapy: What Does the Research Say?
  • Joseph Maizlish on Culture and Psychotherapy: What Does the Research Say?

Tags

addiction Alliance behavioral health brief therapy Carl Rogers CBT cdoi common factors conferences continuing education denmark evidence based medicine evidence based practice Evolution of Psychotherapy excellence feedback feedback informed treatment healthcare holland icce international center for cliniclal excellence medicine mental health meta-analysis Norway NREPP ors outcome measurement outcome rating scale post traumatic stress practice-based evidence psychology psychometrics psychotherapy psychotherapy networker public behavioral health randomized clinical trial SAMHSA session rating scale srs supershrinks sweden Therapist Effects therapy Training