SCOTT D Miller - For the latest and greatest information on Feedback Informed Treatment

  • About
    • About Scott
    • Publications
  • Training and Consultation
  • Workshop Calendar
  • FIT Measures Licensing
  • FIT Software Tools
  • Online Store
  • Top Performance Blog
  • Contact Scott
info@scottdmiller.com 773.404.5130

Is your therapy making your clients worse? The Guardian Strikes Again

June 12, 2014 By scottdm 1 Comment

demand-evidence-and-think

Last week, an article appeared in The Guardian, one of the U.K.’s largest daily newspapers.  “Counselling and Therapy can be Harmful,” the headline boldly asserted, citing results of a study yet to be published.  It certainly got my attention.

Do some people in therapy get worse?  The answer is, most assuredly, “Yes.”  Research dating back several decades puts the figure at about 10% (Lambert, 2010).  Said another way, at termination, roughly one out of ten people are functioning more poorly than they were at the beginning of treatment.

The cause?  Here’s what we know.  Despite claims to the contrary (e.g., Lilenfeld, 2007), no psychotherapy approach tested in a clinical trial has ever been shown to reliably lead to or increase the chances of deterioration.  NONE.  Scary stories about dangerous psychological treatments are limited to a handful of fringe therapies–approaches that have been never vetted scientifically and which all practitioners, but a few, avoid.

So, if it’s not about the method, then how to account for deterioration?  As the article points out, “some therapists had a lot more clients [who] deteriorated than others.”  And yet, while that statement is true–lots of prior research shows that some do more harm than others–there are too few such clinicians to account for the total number of clients who worsen.  Moreover, beyond that 10%, between 30 and 50% of people in treatment experience no benefit whatsoever!

Here is where the old adage, “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure,” applies.  Whatever the cause, lack of progress and risk of deterioration are issues for all clinicians.  A growing body of research makes clear, the key to addressing the problem is tracking the progress of clients from visit to visit so that those not improving, or getting worse, can be identified and offered alternatives.

It’s not hard to get started.  You can learn a simple, evidence-based method for tracking progress and the quality of the relationship at: www.whatispcoms.com.  Best of all, practitioners can access the tools for free!

After that, join fellow practitioners from the US, Canada, Europe, and Australia  for one of our intensive trainings  coming up this August in Chicago.  I promise you’ll leave prepared to address the issue of deterioration directly and successfully.

Filed Under: Feedback Informed Treatment - FIT Tagged With: clinical trial, counselling, lilenfeld, michael lambery, psychotherapy, the guardian, therapy, Training, whatispcoms

What can therapists learn from the CIA? Experts versus the "Wisdom of the Crowd"

May 6, 2014 By scottdm Leave a Comment

Central psychotherapy agency

What can we therapists learn from the CIA?  In a phrase, “When it comes to making predictions about important future events, don’t rely on experts!”

After a spate of embarrassing, high-profile intelligence failures, a recent story showed how a relatively small group of average people made better predictions about critical world events than highly-trained analysts with access to classified information.  The four-year study, known as the Good Judgment Project, adds to mounting evidence regarding the power of aggregating independent guesses of regular folks–or what is known as, “the wisdom of the crowd.”

When it comes to therapy, multiple scientific studies show that inviting the “wisdom of the crowd” into treatment as much as doubles effectiveness, while simultaneously cutting drop out and deterioration rates.

Whatever your profession, work setting, or preferred therapeutic approach, the process involves formally soliciting feedback from clients and then comparing the results to empirically established benchmarks.   Getting started is easy:

  • Download and  begin using two free, easy to use tools–one that charts progress, the other the quality of the therapeutic relationship–both of which are listed on SAMHSA’s National Registry of Evidence Based Programs and Practices.
  • Next, access cutting edge technology available on the web, smartphones, and tablets, that makes it easy to anonymously compare the progress of  your clients to effective patterns of practice worldwide.

You can learn more at: www.whatispcoms.com.  Plus, the ICCE–the world’s largest online community of professionals using feedback to enhance clinical judgment–is available at no cost to support you in your efforts.

While you’re at it, be sure and join fellow practitioners from the US, Canada, Europe, and Australia for the “Training of Trainers” or two-day FIT Implementation Intensive coming up this August in Chicago.  You’ll not only learn how to use the measures, but also tap into the collective wisdom of clients and practitioners around the globe.   Space is limited, and we are filling up quickly, so don’t wait to register.

Filed Under: Feedback, Feedback Informed Treatment - FIT Tagged With: feedback, feedback informed treatment, icce, international center for cliniclal excellence, National Registry of Evidence Based Programs and Practices, NREPP, PCOMS, SAMHSA, therapy, Training

Do you know who said, "Sometimes the magic works, sometimes it doesn’t"?

April 30, 2014 By scottdm Leave a Comment

Dan George

Chief Dan George playing the role of Old Lodge Skins in the 1970 movie, “Little Big Man.”  Whether or not you’ve seen or remember the film, if you’re a practicing therapist, you know the wisdom contained in that quote.  No matter how skilled the clinician or devoted the client, “sometimes therapy works, sometimes it doesn’t.”

Evidence from randomized clinical trials indicates that, on average, clinicians achieve a reliable change–that is, a difference not attributable to chance, maturation, or measurement error–with approximately 50% of people treated.  For the most effective therapists, it’s about 70%.  Said another way, all of us fail between 30-50% of the time.

Of greater concern, however, is the finding that we don’t see the failure coming.  Hannan and colleagues (2005) found, for example, that therapists correctly predicted deterioration in only 1 of 550 people treated, despite having been told beforehand the likely percentage of their clients that would worsen and knowing they were participating in a study on the subject!

It’s one thing when “the magic doesn’t work”–nothing is 100%–but it’s an entirely different matter when we go on believing that something is working, when it’s not.  Put bluntly, we are a terminally, and forever hopeful group of professionals!

What to do?  Hannan et al. (2005) found that simple measures of progress in therapy correctly identified 90% of clients “at risk” for a negative outcome or dropout.  Other studies have found that routinely soliciting feedback from people in treatment regarding progress and their experience of the therapeutic relationship as much as doubles effectiveness while simultaneously reducing dropout and deterioration rates.

You can get two, simple, evidence-based measures for free here.   Get started by connecting with and learning from colleagues on the world’s largest, online network of clinicians: The International Center for Clinical Excellence.  It’s free and signing up takes only a minute or two.

Six FIT Manuals-1

Finally, take advantage of a special offer for the 6 Feedback Informed Treatment and Training Manuals, containing step by step instructions for using the scales to guide and improve the services you offer.  These manuals are the reason the ICCE received the perfect scores when SAMHSA reviewed and approved our application for evidence-based status.

Here’s to knowing when our “magic” is working, and when it’s not!

Filed Under: Feedback Informed Treatment - FIT Tagged With: icce, international center for cliniclal excellence, magic, outcome measurement, randomized clinical trial, therapy

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Next Page »

SEARCH

Subscribe for updates from my blog.

  

Upcoming Training

FIT Implementation Intensive 2018
FIT Supervision Intensive 2018
FIT Supervision Intensive 2018

NREPP Certified

HTML tutorial

LinkedIn

Topics of Interest:

  • Behavioral Health (107)
  • behavioral health (4)
  • Brain-based Research (1)
  • CDOI (14)
  • Conferences and Training (66)
  • deliberate practice (19)
  • Dodo Verdict (8)
  • Drug and Alcohol (3)
  • evidence-based practice (55)
  • excellence (56)
  • Feedback (31)
  • Feedback Informed Treatment – FIT (141)
  • FIT (18)
  • FIT Software Tools (10)
  • ICCE (25)
  • Implementation (5)
  • medication adherence (3)
  • obesity (1)
  • PCOMS (10)
  • Practice Based Evidence (36)
  • PTSD (3)
  • Suicide (1)
  • Termination (1)
  • Therapeutic Relationship (3)
  • Top Performance (39)

Recent Posts

  • Finding Meaning in Psychotherapy Amidst the Trivia and Trivial
  • Symptom Reduction or Well-being: What Outcome should Matter Most in Psychotherapy
  • Ho, Ho, Oh No! Science, politics, and the demise of the National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices
  • Joint Commission and SAMHSA Set New Standard of Care for Measurement Based Care
  • Better Results through Deliberate Practice

Recent Comments

  • David G. Markham on Finding Meaning in Psychotherapy Amidst the Trivia and Trivial
  • Bob Bertolino on Finding Meaning in Psychotherapy Amidst the Trivia and Trivial
  • Erik on Is Documentation Helping or Hindering Mental Health Care? Please Let me know.
  • Sarah O'Flaherty on Finding Meaning in Psychotherapy Amidst the Trivia and Trivial
  • Daniel Mois on Finding Meaning in Psychotherapy Amidst the Trivia and Trivial

Tags

addiction Alliance behavioral health brief therapy Carl Rogers CBT cdoi common factors conferences continuing education denmark evidence based medicine evidence based practice Evolution of Psychotherapy excellence feedback feedback informed treatment healthcare holland icce international center for cliniclal excellence medicine mental health meta-analysis Norway NREPP ors outcome measurement outcome rating scale post traumatic stress practice-based evidence psychology psychometrics psychotherapy psychotherapy networker public behavioral health randomized clinical trial SAMHSA session rating scale srs supershrinks sweden Therapist Effects therapy Training